Skip to main content

Gender and programming

As a software developer, I see regular discussion about gender issues in software engineering. In particular, this article by Bruce Perens asserts that women are treated badly in open source, and gives some suggestions how to address it. Another interesting website is geekfeminism.org, in particular their Timeline of incidents.

I would certainly agree with Perens that online communities can be very hostile and rude, yet I think it goes too far to suggest that the majority of men in general, and open source contributors in particular, have a problem, even subconsciously, with women. The few women I have encountered in a technical context have been excellent, and I wish there were more of them.

I certainly avoid online discussions for the reason that people can be very rude, and this is a real shame. But as a man, who in spite of my limited online presence, has been at the receiving of rudeness from plenty of men and women. The normal, sensible reaction to this, is that online communities (including open source software) aren't worth bothering with.

Women have the extra burden, because feminists tell them so, that maybe the rudeness was because of their gender. It must be like being black, where one can be never be sure whether you failed to get the job because of skin colour, or because you didn't do the interview tasks very well.

But this assumption would be wrong. It's possible that men are more tolerant of rudeness than women are, or are able to roll with it a bit more. But also, women may not enjoy the male dominated atmosphere, and male abruptness in general. I certainly would find it a bit hard dealing with a female-dominated community. But if females don't want to hang out with a bunch of nerds, who is being the sexist?

The assertion that online communities are filled with sexism strikes me as very odd. I know literally hundreds of software developers, and whilst some of them are a bit odd, none of them are aggressive or have ever expressed racist or sexist opinions. I haven't heard a sexist joke in decades, either online (in a tech forum) or in the workplace. I think this compares extremely favourably to many other professions. The only thing software developers are universally prejudiced against is stupidity.

So I'm struggling to reconcile my own experiences, with what Perens, feminists and social justice warriors are telling me is reality. It would be weird, if in a community of millions, there weren't a few sexist incidents each year, but this must be balanced against the 99% of engineers who are colour-blind and gender-blind. Yes there are bad apples, and yes they should be shamed and prosecuted as appropriate, but I don't think software engineering is worse than other professions.

As usual, I think gender issues have been overanalysed. The rudeness is a problem, but people who are rude to women are generally rude to men as well. I would certainly welcome more civility and respect online.

None of this has touched on the underlying reasons for gender biasses, either in computer programming as a profession, or in open source. For sure, there was a time when children were pigeonholed by gender, but that time is largely over now. Society still paints certain professions as certain genders, but it certainly isn't the fault of the engineers who actually work in the subject. Many professions are gendered, many for no good reason, yet you rarely hear feminists fighting for gender equality in linguistics or veterinary science, even though in my opinion, gender studies should encompass both genders.

I resent the suggestion that this is a consequence of "male privilege" to be allowed to sit in front of a computer screen 80 hours a week, and consequently, that males are actively trying to maintain their privilege (i.e. patriarchy) by keeping women out. Programming is a privilege, but only because it's a privilege doing what you love, and it's not a zero-sum game. My employment as a programmer isn't keeping someone else out.

Almost every engineer I know is positive towards gender equality in general, and to the idea of getting more women into computing. I say 'almost', only because I haven't solicited an opinion from everyone, but often you don't need to, because gender equality is a given. This doesn't match feminists' view of software engineers, because feminists are barking up the wrong tree, and blaming everything on men because it's intellectually lazy.

The geeks have done far more for gender equality, by transforming the workplace and home through technology, than social scientists have ever done.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Breaking the Article 50 Impasse

Andrew Tyrie overestimates the UK's control over when the UK government can invoke Article 50. As with much of the Brexit debate, hope and aspiration trump cold hard reality. The next few months will see a lot of work by the UK government setting up new departments and policy positions relating to the triggering of Article 50 and Britain's exit from the EU. This is a sensible and necessary delay. However this article by The Independent makes the case that the UK should delay invoking Article 50 until we establish an informal agreement with the EU on our exit terms. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-theresa-may-andrew-tyrie-must-manage-unrealistic-expectations-warns-tory-mp-a7220681.html This is very desirable from the UK's perspective, but flatly contradicts statements by the EU (including direct statements by Jean-Claude Juncker, Donald Tusk and Cecilia Malmström, as well as official EU policy) that no talks can happen prior to invoking Article 50...

Can information theory prove the existence of God?

I recently came across this website by Perry Marshall, which makes a really interesting proof of the existence of God. The argument is basically that DNA constitutes information (a code), yet all information that we know of is the product of a mind. Randomness cannot create information. Therefore, God exists. Lovely argument. Now let's pick some holes. 1) My first observation is that this argument is almost exactly the same as entropy. The argument is that DNA is a low entropy state. Yet randomness always increases entropy. Therefore DNA cannot be the product of random processes, therefore it must be the work of God (or Maxwell's Demon). However this argument is invalid because localised decreases in entropy are perfectly possible, and expected, even though the entropy of the system as a whole increases. Considering that the site claims to make use of information theory, it presumably is aware of information entropy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_entropy It fo...

What next for the UK?

Although events are unfolding at a rapid pace, a lot of these things are largely irrelevant. It looks like the Conservative Party will hold itself together and conduct an orderly leadership election. The sheer panic of Friday 24rd of June is now over, and the markets have rebounded. There will be no annulment of the result, no re-runs, and no early general election. The rhetoric of the Leave politicians has changed. There has been a huge amount of back-pedalling by the Leave campaigners, who now recognise late in the day the need to cooperate closely with Europe. They now recognise that they must (1) stay in the single market, and (2) retain bank "passporting" rights, which mean that our banks can operate in Europe from London. By default, both of these would be forfeited if we left the EU. The markets have responded positively, because if Britain does maintain access to the single market and passporting, then it's almost business as usual. But I fear their optimism ...