Dear Andrew Smith MP,
I am writing to you concerning the education reforms that your government is steamrolling through.
I strongly disagree with faith-based selection. I think the whole idea of insulating people from other cultures, other peoples, and other ideas is actually quite abhorrent. Yet this is what faith-based schools do.
You can't mandate one hour a week for studying multiculturalism or religious education, that is simply not enough to integrate people. The only way to integrate, appreciate and respect one another's cultures is via contact with other people. My prejudices quickly melt away after spending just ten minutes with someone from a different background to myself.
I can understand that some parents may want their children to grow up to be good Catholics or Muslims, but I would rather that the decision was taken by the child, not by the parents. I find the differences between the faiths to be largely artificial, and forcing it upon children at an early age will just divide society. The example of faith-based selection in Northern Ireland is proof that this just fosters prejudice, and denies children a balanced view in life. Surely the only way for multiculturalism to work is via integration, not division, and it is wrong to give in to parents' demands on this issue.
I would urge faith-based selection to be outlawed, in the same way that it is outlawed in the workplace. It is, to use Tony Blair's word, an anomaly (though he was not talking about education). Parents who want their children growing up in a vacuum have the evenings and the weekends to indoctrinate their children into their faith and culture.
On the other hand, I do favour selection based on ability. I went to a grammar school, and eventually came out as best scholar and went on to Cambridge where I got a first and a PhD. I am so grateful that I was able to receive a good education from the state, and I think that forcing me to go to a comprehensive school would have been to my detriment. To remain competitive, the UK must foster competence at all levels, not try to drag everyone down. It only takes one disruptive child to ruin a class.
I would instead urge greater provision for the brightest students. Whilst it is dangerous to label students and bright or mediocre at an early age (I was a very late starter but just about scraped into grammar school), it is important to challenge and develop the brightest students. The comprehensive system fails to do that. I would bet that money spent on brighter students would be fantastic value, and would be a more rewarding experience for teachers and students alike. Look at the examples of Sweden and Finland.
Why should quality of education be based on the wealth or faith of the parents? I would much rather it was based on the potential of the child.
Thank you for taking the time to read this. Unfortunately I think your government has got it completely wrong on this issue, and I see a worrying trend that Tony Blair's faith-based agenda is once again taking him down the wrong route (Iraq being the first faith-based mistake). While his intentions may be good, the results may not be.
Yours sincerely,
Calum Grant
I am writing to you concerning the education reforms that your government is steamrolling through.
I strongly disagree with faith-based selection. I think the whole idea of insulating people from other cultures, other peoples, and other ideas is actually quite abhorrent. Yet this is what faith-based schools do.
You can't mandate one hour a week for studying multiculturalism or religious education, that is simply not enough to integrate people. The only way to integrate, appreciate and respect one another's cultures is via contact with other people. My prejudices quickly melt away after spending just ten minutes with someone from a different background to myself.
I can understand that some parents may want their children to grow up to be good Catholics or Muslims, but I would rather that the decision was taken by the child, not by the parents. I find the differences between the faiths to be largely artificial, and forcing it upon children at an early age will just divide society. The example of faith-based selection in Northern Ireland is proof that this just fosters prejudice, and denies children a balanced view in life. Surely the only way for multiculturalism to work is via integration, not division, and it is wrong to give in to parents' demands on this issue.
I would urge faith-based selection to be outlawed, in the same way that it is outlawed in the workplace. It is, to use Tony Blair's word, an anomaly (though he was not talking about education). Parents who want their children growing up in a vacuum have the evenings and the weekends to indoctrinate their children into their faith and culture.
On the other hand, I do favour selection based on ability. I went to a grammar school, and eventually came out as best scholar and went on to Cambridge where I got a first and a PhD. I am so grateful that I was able to receive a good education from the state, and I think that forcing me to go to a comprehensive school would have been to my detriment. To remain competitive, the UK must foster competence at all levels, not try to drag everyone down. It only takes one disruptive child to ruin a class.
I would instead urge greater provision for the brightest students. Whilst it is dangerous to label students and bright or mediocre at an early age (I was a very late starter but just about scraped into grammar school), it is important to challenge and develop the brightest students. The comprehensive system fails to do that. I would bet that money spent on brighter students would be fantastic value, and would be a more rewarding experience for teachers and students alike. Look at the examples of Sweden and Finland.
Why should quality of education be based on the wealth or faith of the parents? I would much rather it was based on the potential of the child.
Thank you for taking the time to read this. Unfortunately I think your government has got it completely wrong on this issue, and I see a worrying trend that Tony Blair's faith-based agenda is once again taking him down the wrong route (Iraq being the first faith-based mistake). While his intentions may be good, the results may not be.
Yours sincerely,
Calum Grant
Comments