Skip to main content

Gender and programming

As a software developer, I see regular discussion about gender issues in software engineering. In particular, this article by Bruce Perens asserts that women are treated badly in open source, and gives some suggestions how to address it. Another interesting website is geekfeminism.org, in particular their Timeline of incidents.

I would certainly agree with Perens that online communities can be very hostile and rude, yet I think it goes too far to suggest that the majority of men in general, and open source contributors in particular, have a problem, even subconsciously, with women. The few women I have encountered in a technical context have been excellent, and I wish there were more of them.

I certainly avoid online discussions for the reason that people can be very rude, and this is a real shame. But as a man, who in spite of my limited online presence, has been at the receiving of rudeness from plenty of men and women. The normal, sensible reaction to this, is that online communities (including open source software) aren't worth bothering with.

Women have the extra burden, because feminists tell them so, that maybe the rudeness was because of their gender. It must be like being black, where one can be never be sure whether you failed to get the job because of skin colour, or because you didn't do the interview tasks very well.

But this assumption would be wrong. It's possible that men are more tolerant of rudeness than women are, or are able to roll with it a bit more. But also, women may not enjoy the male dominated atmosphere, and male abruptness in general. I certainly would find it a bit hard dealing with a female-dominated community. But if females don't want to hang out with a bunch of nerds, who is being the sexist?

The assertion that online communities are filled with sexism strikes me as very odd. I know literally hundreds of software developers, and whilst some of them are a bit odd, none of them are aggressive or have ever expressed racist or sexist opinions. I haven't heard a sexist joke in decades, either online (in a tech forum) or in the workplace. I think this compares extremely favourably to many other professions. The only thing software developers are universally prejudiced against is stupidity.

So I'm struggling to reconcile my own experiences, with what Perens, feminists and social justice warriors are telling me is reality. It would be weird, if in a community of millions, there weren't a few sexist incidents each year, but this must be balanced against the 99% of engineers who are colour-blind and gender-blind. Yes there are bad apples, and yes they should be shamed and prosecuted as appropriate, but I don't think software engineering is worse than other professions.

As usual, I think gender issues have been overanalysed. The rudeness is a problem, but people who are rude to women are generally rude to men as well. I would certainly welcome more civility and respect online.

None of this has touched on the underlying reasons for gender biasses, either in computer programming as a profession, or in open source. For sure, there was a time when children were pigeonholed by gender, but that time is largely over now. Society still paints certain professions as certain genders, but it certainly isn't the fault of the engineers who actually work in the subject. Many professions are gendered, many for no good reason, yet you rarely hear feminists fighting for gender equality in linguistics or veterinary science, even though in my opinion, gender studies should encompass both genders.

I resent the suggestion that this is a consequence of "male privilege" to be allowed to sit in front of a computer screen 80 hours a week, and consequently, that males are actively trying to maintain their privilege (i.e. patriarchy) by keeping women out. Programming is a privilege, but only because it's a privilege doing what you love, and it's not a zero-sum game. My employment as a programmer isn't keeping someone else out.

Almost every engineer I know is positive towards gender equality in general, and to the idea of getting more women into computing. I say 'almost', only because I haven't solicited an opinion from everyone, but often you don't need to, because gender equality is a given. This doesn't match feminists' view of software engineers, because feminists are barking up the wrong tree, and blaming everything on men because it's intellectually lazy.

The geeks have done far more for gender equality, by transforming the workplace and home through technology, than social scientists have ever done.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Breaking the Article 50 Impasse

Andrew Tyrie overestimates the UK's control over when the UK government can invoke Article 50. As with much of the Brexit debate, hope and aspiration trump cold hard reality. The next few months will see a lot of work by the UK government setting up new departments and policy positions relating to the triggering of Article 50 and Britain's exit from the EU. This is a sensible and necessary delay. However this article by The Independent makes the case that the UK should delay invoking Article 50 until we establish an informal agreement with the EU on our exit terms. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-theresa-may-andrew-tyrie-must-manage-unrealistic-expectations-warns-tory-mp-a7220681.html This is very desirable from the UK's perspective, but flatly contradicts statements by the EU (including direct statements by Jean-Claude Juncker, Donald Tusk and Cecilia Malmström, as well as official EU policy) that no talks can happen prior to invoking Article 50

Simulation independence

I recently came across Nick Boström's article about the simulation argument , which goes that there is a non-zero chance that we are actually simulated individuals, and not actually made of carbon at all. It was spun out of The Matrix series of movies, though is a recurring theme right from Descartes and the Brain in a Vat. Key to this idea is the argument of substrate independence , that is, carbon-based cells are not the only possible way of conjuring consciousness. Surely it isn't the carbon-based molecules per se that cause consciousness, but rather their configuration, and the kinds of computation (if that's the right word) being performed. Surely any "computer program" that reproduces the workings of the brain sufficiently well would suffice, since its operation and outputs would be essentially identical to the biological brain. The simulation argument goes that we are not all that far from achieving that level of computation, so therefore there may wel
Accosted by Jehova's Witnesses The old ring at the door. "Are we expecting anybody?" asks my dad. The answer is no. Instead it's Jehova's witnesses, which I answer. Let the sport begin! Opening gambit: they ask what is the name of God? I answer Yawhe. They seem impressed, then correct me when I also say "God", which they say is only his title. Ok. Then they ask about morality. This is an excellent topic of debate. Where do morals come from? They say God, and he is a person. I argue that he is not human, or that he has thoughts and morals. They ask if I have thought about God seriously, I answer yes, and have rejected the idea, saying that it is a mistake to give God human characteristics. Is society going downhill? They claim it is going downhill, I claim humans have always been fairly rotten to each other. I immediately lay my cards on the table. I say that psychology, and morals are evolved, and did not come from God. They claim morali