Skip to main content

A Brexit Soap Opera

Brian lives with long-term partner Eugene. But Brian is always grumbling, and one day they decide to split up.

Act 1: The breakup

Scene 1:
Brian: We need to talk.
Eugene: Uh oh, okay then.
Brian: You've changed and I'm not happy any more. I don't like living under your rules. You need to change...
Eugene: I'm not sure I can.
Brian: That's it, I'm walking out.
Scene 2:
Brian: I need to take control of my life. I'm leaving.
Eugene: Fine, just go.
Brian: I'll save so much money because I won't need to pay any household bills.
Eugene: You are an idiot.
Brian: I save so much time on paperwork.
Eugene: You are still an idiot.
Brian: I won't need to see your stupid friends any more.
Eugene: But my friends are great and really help us out.
Brian: I really mean it. I'm going.
Eugene: Well, what are you waiting for?
Act 2: The separation

Scene 1:
Brian: Before I go, I have a few demands.
Eugene: What? Just go away already.
Brian: Can I still live here?
Eugene: No, we split up.
Brian: Please, I've nowhere else to live.
Eugene: Fine, but you get a smaller room, my friends can come and go as they please, and you pay more rent.
Brian: No way.
Eugene: Fine, live somewhere else.
Brian: Fine. Bye.
Eugene: You owe me three thousand pounds.
Scene 2:
Brian: Erm, do you still have that room spare in your house?
Frances: Actually, no, I decided to use it for something.
Brian: Please?
Eugene: Ok, you can sleep on the couch. Higher rent though, and only for a few months.
Act 3: The reconciliation

Scene 1: 
Much later. Eugene bumps into Brian in town. 
Eugene: Wow Brian, you look so great these days. Is that a Porsche you're driving?
Brian: Jaguar actually. I only buy British.
Eugene: No, Indian. Listen, we really should go for a coffee some time...
Scene 2: 
Scene 1 was a dream, and Brian wakes up from his alcoholic stupor. He is looking the worse for wear after sleeping in the park for a year. 
Brian: I'm sorry I was so horrible to you. How could I have been so stupid? Erm, can we get back together?
Eugene: Eww, you stink.
Frances: No way.
Eugene: Fine, but from now on, only I decide the rules and you pay rent. You don't overrule me all the time. And we get properly married this time.
Brian: That's so great! I promise I'll never be mean to you ever again. I love EU.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Breaking the Article 50 Impasse

Andrew Tyrie overestimates the UK's control over when the UK government can invoke Article 50. As with much of the Brexit debate, hope and aspiration trump cold hard reality. The next few months will see a lot of work by the UK government setting up new departments and policy positions relating to the triggering of Article 50 and Britain's exit from the EU. This is a sensible and necessary delay. However this article by The Independent makes the case that the UK should delay invoking Article 50 until we establish an informal agreement with the EU on our exit terms. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-theresa-may-andrew-tyrie-must-manage-unrealistic-expectations-warns-tory-mp-a7220681.html This is very desirable from the UK's perspective, but flatly contradicts statements by the EU (including direct statements by Jean-Claude Juncker, Donald Tusk and Cecilia Malmström, as well as official EU policy) that no talks can happen prior to invoking Article 50
3 comments
Read more

Simulation independence

I recently came across Nick Boström's article about the simulation argument , which goes that there is a non-zero chance that we are actually simulated individuals, and not actually made of carbon at all. It was spun out of The Matrix series of movies, though is a recurring theme right from Descartes and the Brain in a Vat. Key to this idea is the argument of substrate independence , that is, carbon-based cells are not the only possible way of conjuring consciousness. Surely it isn't the carbon-based molecules per se that cause consciousness, but rather their configuration, and the kinds of computation (if that's the right word) being performed. Surely any "computer program" that reproduces the workings of the brain sufficiently well would suffice, since its operation and outputs would be essentially identical to the biological brain. The simulation argument goes that we are not all that far from achieving that level of computation, so therefore there may wel
3 comments
Read more
Accosted by Jehova's Witnesses The old ring at the door. "Are we expecting anybody?" asks my dad. The answer is no. Instead it's Jehova's witnesses, which I answer. Let the sport begin! Opening gambit: they ask what is the name of God? I answer Yawhe. They seem impressed, then correct me when I also say "God", which they say is only his title. Ok. Then they ask about morality. This is an excellent topic of debate. Where do morals come from? They say God, and he is a person. I argue that he is not human, or that he has thoughts and morals. They ask if I have thought about God seriously, I answer yes, and have rejected the idea, saying that it is a mistake to give God human characteristics. Is society going downhill? They claim it is going downhill, I claim humans have always been fairly rotten to each other. I immediately lay my cards on the table. I say that psychology, and morals are evolved, and did not come from God. They claim morali
1 comment
Read more