Skip to main content

How the right misunderstands Europe

and how this will harm the UK

It’s becoming clearer by the day that the result of the referendum for the UK to leave the EU was a right wing coup. Some types of right wing are “simply” nationalists - they like to keep things British and some of them don’t like too many foreigners. Enough is enough. But there are other types of right wing which are more interesting - the right wing liberals. These are ultra-conservatives who believe that anything interfering with a free market is inherently wrong.

Free marketeers are not particularly concerned about immigration. But they are instinctively suspicious of the EU, with its working time directives, environmental protections, human rights, workplace rights, product quality standards, and “red tape” (ha - wait until the UK leaves the EU!) and somewhat left-wing leanings. In short, ethics. Some prominent right-wingers may even have experienced personal inconvenience or minor financial loss at the hands of the EU, and are out to get it. For example, Rupert Murdoch simply has no influence over the EU in the same way that he does over the UK.

Thus free-marketeers have decided that the “nation state” is the superior model than European superstate, and indeed much of the UK population feels the same way. The problem is that the UK leaving the EU will not turn the EU into a set of small states again. We cannot turn back the clock 40 years and trade with each country in Europe any more. It’s the UK and EU, that is the reality we live in now, and that will put the UK at a distinct disadvantage. The UK’s best effort to scupper the EU will come to nothing.

The second problem is that the right-wing liberals are in for a mighty surprise when the UK does not get a reasonable exit deal with the EU. Sure, it may be in the EU’s short term financial interests to strike a favourable deal with the UK, but that entirely misunderstands the situation. Right-wing conservatives simply don’t understand that other people have values other than money.

This has far-reaching consequences. The immediate one is that the EU values its principles and “freedoms” far more than any seedy financial deal it could strike with the UK. To the far-right that seems utterly illogical, because they fail to appreciate European values.

The far-right sees trade liberalisation as the only source of wealth, without appreciating that “left-wing” values such as a healthy educated workforce, social mobility, freedom of movement, good infrastructure etc. are all necessary underpinnings that drive the real economy. Everything else is smoke and mirrors that tends to make the few richer. Thus, the far-right will be disappointed when in ten years time, the UK is still much poorer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When will the UK trigger Article 50?

Article 50 (A50) represents the point of no return, where the UK formally announces that it is withdrawing from the EU. The real point of no return was of course the referendum result, but A50 represents the next milestone in the Brexit process. Those calling for an early A50 argue that there is no benefit to delaying, as this just adds uncertainty and delays the entire process and inevitable recovery. They (mainly Leavers) don't want the referendum result annulled. Those who want to delay A50 say that we need time to prepare (not least, set up a new department for Brexit), and entertain the notion of pre-negotiations, as well as buying time to set up trade deals elsewhere in the world. The EU is very clear that there can be no exit negotiations until Article 50 has been triggered, and it looks very unwilling to compromise. The markets have taken the Brexit vote relatively calmly, and so far it's been very smooth going. This is because nothing has actually happened yet, and wo...

Can information theory prove the existence of God?

I recently came across this website by Perry Marshall, which makes a really interesting proof of the existence of God. The argument is basically that DNA constitutes information (a code), yet all information that we know of is the product of a mind. Randomness cannot create information. Therefore, God exists. Lovely argument. Now let's pick some holes. 1) My first observation is that this argument is almost exactly the same as entropy. The argument is that DNA is a low entropy state. Yet randomness always increases entropy. Therefore DNA cannot be the product of random processes, therefore it must be the work of God (or Maxwell's Demon). However this argument is invalid because localised decreases in entropy are perfectly possible, and expected, even though the entropy of the system as a whole increases. Considering that the site claims to make use of information theory, it presumably is aware of information entropy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_entropy It fo...

Identity is taking over politics

Mark Lilla writes in the New Statesman ( September 2017 ) that the "Left", i.e. the US Democratic Party, social justice and anti-facism movements, lost the US election due to being side-tracked by gender and race issues. Enough of the electorate weren't buying it and Trump won. In hindsight attacking a large proportion of the electorate based on their gender and race is never a good idea, no matter which race or gender you are talking about. No, it's not acceptable to denigrate men or white people either. Trump of course did the same, by attacking foreigners, Mexicans, Muslims and women, but he got away with it due to media bias and partisan politics. At home, Peter North, a prominent pro-Brexit blogger, tweeted about "self determination". This immediately raised the issue of what is "self", and lo and behold we are back to identity again. If we all feel European, then being governed by the EU is indeed self-determination, and let's not ki...