Skip to main content

How the right misunderstands Europe

and how this will harm the UK

It’s becoming clearer by the day that the result of the referendum for the UK to leave the EU was a right wing coup. Some types of right wing are “simply” nationalists - they like to keep things British and some of them don’t like too many foreigners. Enough is enough. But there are other types of right wing which are more interesting - the right wing liberals. These are ultra-conservatives who believe that anything interfering with a free market is inherently wrong.

Free marketeers are not particularly concerned about immigration. But they are instinctively suspicious of the EU, with its working time directives, environmental protections, human rights, workplace rights, product quality standards, and “red tape” (ha - wait until the UK leaves the EU!) and somewhat left-wing leanings. In short, ethics. Some prominent right-wingers may even have experienced personal inconvenience or minor financial loss at the hands of the EU, and are out to get it. For example, Rupert Murdoch simply has no influence over the EU in the same way that he does over the UK.

Thus free-marketeers have decided that the “nation state” is the superior model than European superstate, and indeed much of the UK population feels the same way. The problem is that the UK leaving the EU will not turn the EU into a set of small states again. We cannot turn back the clock 40 years and trade with each country in Europe any more. It’s the UK and EU, that is the reality we live in now, and that will put the UK at a distinct disadvantage. The UK’s best effort to scupper the EU will come to nothing.

The second problem is that the right-wing liberals are in for a mighty surprise when the UK does not get a reasonable exit deal with the EU. Sure, it may be in the EU’s short term financial interests to strike a favourable deal with the UK, but that entirely misunderstands the situation. Right-wing conservatives simply don’t understand that other people have values other than money.

This has far-reaching consequences. The immediate one is that the EU values its principles and “freedoms” far more than any seedy financial deal it could strike with the UK. To the far-right that seems utterly illogical, because they fail to appreciate European values.

The far-right sees trade liberalisation as the only source of wealth, without appreciating that “left-wing” values such as a healthy educated workforce, social mobility, freedom of movement, good infrastructure etc. are all necessary underpinnings that drive the real economy. Everything else is smoke and mirrors that tends to make the few richer. Thus, the far-right will be disappointed when in ten years time, the UK is still much poorer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Breaking the Article 50 Impasse

Andrew Tyrie overestimates the UK's control over when the UK government can invoke Article 50. As with much of the Brexit debate, hope and aspiration trump cold hard reality. The next few months will see a lot of work by the UK government setting up new departments and policy positions relating to the triggering of Article 50 and Britain's exit from the EU. This is a sensible and necessary delay. However this article by The Independent makes the case that the UK should delay invoking Article 50 until we establish an informal agreement with the EU on our exit terms. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-theresa-may-andrew-tyrie-must-manage-unrealistic-expectations-warns-tory-mp-a7220681.html This is very desirable from the UK's perspective, but flatly contradicts statements by the EU (including direct statements by Jean-Claude Juncker, Donald Tusk and Cecilia Malmström, as well as official EU policy) that no talks can happen prior to invoking Article 50...

Can information theory prove the existence of God?

I recently came across this website by Perry Marshall, which makes a really interesting proof of the existence of God. The argument is basically that DNA constitutes information (a code), yet all information that we know of is the product of a mind. Randomness cannot create information. Therefore, God exists. Lovely argument. Now let's pick some holes. 1) My first observation is that this argument is almost exactly the same as entropy. The argument is that DNA is a low entropy state. Yet randomness always increases entropy. Therefore DNA cannot be the product of random processes, therefore it must be the work of God (or Maxwell's Demon). However this argument is invalid because localised decreases in entropy are perfectly possible, and expected, even though the entropy of the system as a whole increases. Considering that the site claims to make use of information theory, it presumably is aware of information entropy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_entropy It fo...

What next for the UK?

Although events are unfolding at a rapid pace, a lot of these things are largely irrelevant. It looks like the Conservative Party will hold itself together and conduct an orderly leadership election. The sheer panic of Friday 24rd of June is now over, and the markets have rebounded. There will be no annulment of the result, no re-runs, and no early general election. The rhetoric of the Leave politicians has changed. There has been a huge amount of back-pedalling by the Leave campaigners, who now recognise late in the day the need to cooperate closely with Europe. They now recognise that they must (1) stay in the single market, and (2) retain bank "passporting" rights, which mean that our banks can operate in Europe from London. By default, both of these would be forfeited if we left the EU. The markets have responded positively, because if Britain does maintain access to the single market and passporting, then it's almost business as usual. But I fear their optimism ...